Peptide COA watchdog
Fake COAs don’t get a free pass.
The COA Catcher follows the paper trail behind peptide Certificates of Analysis—checking report IDs, batch details, laboratory attribution and source evidence before a case ever reaches the board.
Evidence has a trail. We follow it.
The registry is being built. No vendor findings are published yet.
A flagged inconsistency is a reason to verify—not a verdict. A listing does not, by itself, establish fraud, illegality, intent or liability. Every case must be read at its stated product, batch, transaction and source scope, together with its limitations, date, review status and any vendor or laboratory response. Absence from the registry is not an endorsement or proof of safety, authenticity or compliance.
Our verification trail
Receipts over rumours.
A polished PDF is not proof on its own. We examine whether a Certificate of Analysis can be traced, whether its details line up and whether the available evidence supports a narrow public finding.
Suspicion starts a review. It never settles one.
01
Capture the evidence
Preserve the original report, its source, relevant dates and the product, order or batch context.
02
Follow the trail
Check report identifiers, lab attribution, methods, timestamps, verification links and document consistency.
03
Ask for answers
Where appropriate, vendors and laboratories are invited to clarify the record or provide supporting material.
04
Publish the file
A finding goes live only after review. Responses, material updates and corrections remain part of the file.
Certificate cross-check
What raises our eyebrow
These clues can make a peptide COA worth a closer look. None is proof of a fake certificate on its own.
ID // TRACE
Report identity
Report numbers, verification links or QR destinations that do not resolve—or point somewhere unexpected.
LAB // SOURCE
Laboratory attribution
Lab names, contact details, report formats or claims that conflict with an official laboratory source.
BATCH // MATCH
Document consistency
Certificates reused across products or batches, mismatched dates and methods, missing pages or visible edits.
The case board
Quiet for now. That’s deliberate.
No vendor findings are live yet. Every future listing must carry a clear evidence trail, scope, review status, publication date and right-of-reply record.
0 published cases
Nothing is pinned to the board yet.
We are building the registry one properly documented case at a time. A tip or suspicious COA never appears here automatically.
For evidence holders
Got a COA that doesn’t add up?
Keep the original file, the page it came from, vendor, product and batch details, and a note explaining what caught your attention. Anonymous tips may start a review, but they are never published as fact without corroboration.
Private evidence intake is being prepared. No submission is published automatically.
For vendors and laboratories
On the other side of the file?
Provide context, supporting documents or a correction. Material responses are assessed fairly, date-stamped and reflected clearly in the public record.
The formal right-of-reply channel will open before the first case is published.
The standard applies to us, too
Transparency belongs in the case file.
Before public launch, this site must publish complete operator, ownership, funding, affiliation and conflicts disclosures. Readers should be able to assess those interests alongside the evidence record.
The COA Catcher is an educational evidence directory—not a store, testing laboratory, regulator, medical service or substitute for professional advice.